{"id":7043,"date":"2011-09-20T03:54:51","date_gmt":"2011-09-19T19:54:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/buletinonline.net\/v7\/index.php\/2011\/09\/timeline-for-isa-repeal-a-new-mystery-for-najib-and-hisham-to-unravel\/"},"modified":"2011-09-20T03:54:51","modified_gmt":"2011-09-19T19:54:51","slug":"timeline-for-isa-repeal-a-new-mystery-for-najib-and-hisham-to-unravel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/timeline-for-isa-repeal-a-new-mystery-for-najib-and-hisham-to-unravel\/","title":{"rendered":"Timeline for ISA repeal a new mystery for Najib and Hisham to unravel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_NIxs_pjNL9c\/SNhCZrM8RMI\/AAAAAAAAA2I\/VJcUWJ3t6Y8\/s400\/9500ede8e5254595dc8ba63985c4aec8.gif\" border=\"0\" width=\"296\" height=\"190\" style=\"float: right;\" \/>In October of 2009,  Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and his ministry officials met for  about three hours with representatives from the Attorney-General\u2019s  Chambers, the Bar Council, the Barisan Nasional Backbenchers Club,  National Council for Women\u2019s Organisation and the National Civics  Bureau.<\/p>\n<p>The purpose of this three-hour meeting was to discuss amendments to  the ISA. Hishammuddin acknowledged there were parties like the Bar  Council, which still wanted it to be abolished.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe told the council to look at the new ISA first because we are  confident they and many others will be satisfied with the changes that  we will be making,\u201d he had told reporters then.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>What happened to the 2009 amendments<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Hishammuddin said the ISA amendments would revolve around five areas \u2013  the length of detention, rights and treatment of detainees and their  families, the power of the Home Minister, the use of ISA for political  reasons and detention without trial. Lawmakers would start fine-tuning  the amendments to enable the Bill to be tabled in Parliament before the  session ended on December 15, 2009.<\/p>\n<p>Safe to say, the amendments to the ISA never made it to Parliament,  and two years down the road, we are served with what the Bar Council  suggested back in October 2009 &#8211; the abolishing of the ISA.<\/p>\n<p>This is one of many examples that any promise made by Prime Minister  Najib Razak&#8217;s administration will begin with initial fireworks, and  after the lustre of that disappears, Malaysia is back at square one. For  true reforms to happen under Najib\u2019s tenure, real action needs to be  meted out immediately.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>The abuse began under Mahathir <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The ISA was enforce by an Act of Parliament back in 1960.  The first  Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tunku Abdul Rahman, defined the purpose of  the Act as to be used solely against the communists. He said, \u201cMy  Cabinet colleagues and I gave a solemn promise to Parliament and the  nation that the immense powers given to the government under the ISA  would never be used to stifle legitimate opposition and silence lawful  dissent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The third Prime Minister, Tun Hussein Onn, stated at the same time  that his administration had enforced the Act only with a view to curbing  communist activity, and not to repress &#8220;lawful political opposition and  democratic citizen activity&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>As noble as the promises made by the past prime ministers that the  ISA would only be used against the communists, it was conveniently  forgotten by fourth prime minister Mahathir Mohamad who used the ISA  against his political rivals and who-so-ever dared go against him and  the BN government.<\/p>\n<p>Bear in mind, during his tenure as prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad  was also the Home Minister and it is the Home Minister who has full  authority to deem if anyone should be detained under the ISA, which is  feared because it allows the government to detain anyone without trial  for an indefinite period of time.<\/p>\n<p>So for Mahathir to say that the ISA was never used to detain  political rivals is totally untrue. Can Mahathir justify his actions as  Prime Minister during the 1987 Operations Lalang, for example? Where  were the communists? But in large presence were opposition leaders and  these included Karpal Singh, Lim Kit Siang, Mahfuz Omar, Mat Sabu and  scores of others. If this was not political, what is? If this was not  suppressing dissenters, what is?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Just like the 2009 &#8216;amendments&#8217;, it might take another 2 years <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Since 2005, 10,662 people have been arrested under the ISA in the  past 44 years, 4,139 of whom were issued with formal detention orders  and 2,066 were served with restriction orders governing their activities  and where they live. In addition, 12 people were executed for offences  under the ISA between 1984 and 1993.<\/p>\n<p>One of the most recent application of ISA was against Hindu activists  belonging to the group Hindraf who spoke out against government  policies that resulted in Malaysian Indians being marginalized and  sidelined from the country&#8217;s development. In response, former prime  minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi personally signed the detention order  that allowed the leaders of Hindraf to be detained without trial for two  years, with the option for the detention order to be renewed  indefinitely.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the ISA which was meant to contain and stop the communist  resurgence of the 1960s was used to stifle and control the political  landscape in Malaysia. It was used to maintain the BN&#8217;s strangle-hold on  Malaysian politics for 50 over years. Thus, the ISA allowed the growth  of corruption within Malaysian society, supported by the government of  the day.<\/p>\n<p>A mere announcement to abolish the ISA is not enough. Two years ago, a  set of amendments were supposed to be tabled in Parliament. What  happened to those amendments? Can the Home Minister explain what  happened to the proposed amendments?<\/p>\n<p>Suffice to say, back in 2009 Najib Razak broke his promise to amend  the ISA. Now, in 2011; Najib promises to abolish the ISA but in return,  two new laws will be tabled. Indeed, no one seems to be able to decide  when these two new laws will be tabled. Dates stretch all the way up  till March 2012 but do not be surprised if it takes another two years  for Malaysia to see real reforms, if any.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Swapping one evil for two<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>A clear sign of reform would come in two ways. Firstly, an act of  Parliament to abolish the ISA, and secondly, a public disclosure of the  two new laws.<\/p>\n<p>In truth, it would have been easier for the ISA to be abolished  during the years Barisan Nasional had two-thirds majority in Parliament.  Yet, they chose to keep it intact even when the public outcry for the  Act to be abolish reached fever pitch.<\/p>\n<p>This shows that BN does not really pay heed to the rakyat or  populace. Instead, it only moves when it is advantageous or there is  self-benefit to do so. What guarantee do Malaysians have that the  current BN parliamentarians will support the move to abolish the ISA as  announced by Najib Razak?<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, the announcement that two new laws will be enacted to  replace the ISA shows total insincerity on Najib\u2019s part. Why swap an  evil for two evils?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Another toothless Advisory Board?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Yet, if there are any new preemptive prevention laws, then they may  or should take into account Article 151 of the Malaysian Constitution,  which gives to any person detained without trial (under the special  powers against subversion) certain administrative rights.<\/p>\n<p>Under Article 151, the authority, on whose order a person is  detained, shall as soon as may be, inform the detainee of the grounds of  detention and the allegations of fact on which the order is based. The  detainee shall also be given an opportunity within three months, of  making representations against the order to an Advisory Board.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Advisory Board as the name implies is not a court.<\/p>\n<p>Its determinations are also mere recommendations that the government  is under no obligation to accept. It may also be handicapped in its  deliberations by the discretionary power of the government to withhold  facts, the disclosure of which would, in the executive\u2019s opinion be  against national interest.<\/p>\n<p>The Advisory Board, though in line with Article 151, would be the  back-door clause for the Home Ministry to keep someone in detention  longer than needed &#8211; without trial. How different is this than the  existing ISA?<\/p>\n<p>So, this is a factor that Malaysians and legal eagles should watch  out for and not allow the Najib administration to slip past. The point  is, will the BN listen or will they do what they did to the Bar Council  in 2009. Talk a lot but do nothing!<\/p>\n<p>So it is clear that to abolish the ISA would take longer than  expected. Promises made in the past to amend it have yet to be acted on.  Promises were also made in the past on how the ISA will be used, yet  these too were abused.<\/p>\n<p>And along with even more promises to abolish it, we are served with  two new laws. What kind of reforms should Malaysia look forward to given  such an awful backdrop and track record of unreliability? Maybe none at  all.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8211; Malaysia Chronicle<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In October of 2009, Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and his ministry officials met for about three hours with representatives from the Attorney-General\u2019s Chambers, the Bar Council, the Barisan Nasional Backbenchers Club, National Council for Women\u2019s Organisation and the National Civics Bureau. The purpose of this three-hour meeting was to discuss amendments to the ISA. Hishammuddin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"better_featured_image":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7043"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}