{"id":3945,"date":"2010-10-16T18:55:41","date_gmt":"2010-10-16T10:55:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/buletinonline.net\/v7\/index.php\/2010\/10\/is-this-budget-a-najibonomics\/"},"modified":"2010-10-16T18:55:41","modified_gmt":"2010-10-16T10:55:41","slug":"is-this-budget-a-najibonomics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/is-this-budget-a-najibonomics\/","title":{"rendered":"Is this Budget A Najibonomics\u2019?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/buletinonline.net\/v7\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/10\/drzulbajet.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"http:\/\/buletinonline.net\/images\/stories\/berita35\/drzulbajet.gif\" width=\"258\" height=\"190\" style=\"float: right;\" \/>I was tweeting along as the Finance Minister, DS Najib Tun Razak,  unfolded his second budget speech yesterday amidst the usual  parliamentary \u2018hecklings\u2019. My tweets and interviews sparingly found its  way in the mainstream media and as well the alternative internet-based  media-portals.<\/p>\n<p>As I really have something to say rather than having to say  something (that\u2019s a minister\u2019s job), it is perhaps best that I put it  together in a piece. They say \u2018you could only scratch your back best,  yourselves\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Be that as it may, if fiscal prudence was what many might have been  deluded to believe that the FM was committed to do, on the back of 13  consecutive years of fiscal deficit, the budget was everything except  \u2018fiscally prudent\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly it was never his intention. Mention of reducing fiscal  deficit to 5.4% was relegated to the last minute. His mentioning of  reducing it to 5.4% of GDP compared with 5.6% in 2010 (still suspect) is  almost like tongue in cheek.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, I understand the many vulgarities of global economic constraints  and uncertainties. Yes, I understand that you can\u2019t be cutting back the  stimulus packages abruptly or you will slow the economy. Yes, Najib has  to juggle and harmonise at times, the many \u2018mutually exclusive  constraints and demands\u2019. But that\u2019s the defining criterion of a leader!<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Strategic Approach\u2019 more so in a developmental program, the budget  being the most short-term one, is always top-down driven and not  \u2018bottom-up\u2019. You listen to the heart-beats of the rakyat insofar as  getting feedbacks about how they respond to your programmes perhaps of  their expectation and hopes as you are supposed to manage these.<\/p>\n<p>But at the end of the day and in the final analysis, it\u2019s your call,  as the buck stops at you! You can\u2019t blame the rakyat if it fails just  because you consulted them and took their propositions. That\u2019s Strategic  Planning 101. Leader leads and takes calculated risk!<\/p>\n<p>Overall, it is a budget crafted to appease as many a constituency as  possible. On that score Najib has done extremely well. He has not  forgotten to give adequate \u2018goodies\u2019 to all as to inject the \u2018feel-good  factor\u2019 required to turn around the diminished confidence especially of  the lower-income groups at being shortchanged and marginalized. From  that perspective, this conforms to an election budget.<\/p>\n<p>There are promises for more money for JKKK, KAFA teachers, imams,  Orang Asli, NGOs, youth and women\u00a0 as well as moratorium on PLUS tolls  for 5 years, and various other \u2018carrots\u2019 dangled to the rakyat (read  voters). But I hasten to add that moratorium on tolls for now doesn\u2019t  mean that tax-payers money is spared from paying hefty compensation to  Plus though.<\/p>\n<p>While it may bring in a lot of immediate \u2018happiness\u2019, the rakyat are  quite oblivious of the longer term economic impact on their lives of an  irresponsibly crafted budget that will boomerang back to them when  subsidies are reduced or eliminated to fund for the \u2018extravaganza\u2019 and  the endless \u2018leakages\u2019 in the delivery system.<\/p>\n<p>The last thing a politician should do is to try to appease everyone.  Very regrettably, Najib has a penchant for that and this budget speaks  all. After his admission of the era of \u2018Government Knows Best \u2019is over,  his overly populist approach is at time, very worrying as this had  aggravated his predilection for flip-floping.<\/p>\n<p>First things first. So where is the GTP, the ETP, much less the NEM?  If anything I could only see a few EPPs! But they are nonetheless very  big ones.<\/p>\n<p>Among large construction projects that will kick off under the 2011  Budget are the RM43 billion new KL MRT project; the RM5 billion  100-storey Warisan Merdeka tower; the RM26 billion KL International  Financial district; the RM3 billion integrated eco-resort in Karambunai,  Sabah; construction of multiple new highways; and the development of  the 1,084-ha Malaysian Rubber Board land in Sungai Buloh.<\/p>\n<p>The 2011 Budget was deemed a testimony for Najib\u2019s commitment to  reform. Quite sadly, the highlights appeared to be largely big-ticket  construction projects rather than commitments to drastically restructure  the economy by revamping efficiency, productivity and innovation.<\/p>\n<p>I won\u2019t\u00a0deny the sprinkling of incentives in the other NKEAs like the  Islamic Capital Market, Oil and Gas Industry and the advancing Green  Technology. But budget allocation-wise they are relatively modest.<\/p>\n<p>So it is after all, back essentially to  \u2018centrally-planned-pump-priming\u2019 megalomaniac pursuit of \u2018bricks and  mortars construction and in supposedly Public-Private Partnership  initiatives, ending ostensibly and invariably in government undertaking  all the risks of non-delivery.<\/p>\n<p>Analysts noted that the source of funding for mega-projects remained  unclear and added that the market is weary of too many  federally-guaranteed semi-government entities raising money from the  market. So what is New?<\/p>\n<p>Besides, the expectation of further liberalization as espoused by the  NEM of other sub-services, to improve competition while stimulating  private-sector participation didn\u2019t get a boost at all.<\/p>\n<p>The anticipation of the government selling down their stakes to raise  revenue and create more liquidity and perhaps also avoiding the  imminent \u2018over-crowding\u2019 effect in the equity market to encourage more  foreign investors also didn\u2019t see the light of the day.<\/p>\n<p>On the contrary, the talk of Khazanah Nasional and the EPF launching a  general offer for PLUS for over RM20 billion, is rife. While I may not  be necessarily against it, if it is good for the rakyat, the conflicting  and confusing signals Najibonomics is sending to the market is baffling  at best and laughable at its worst.<\/p>\n<p>Little wonder that analysts\u2019 reaction to this Budget is mixed.<\/p>\n<p>The prime minister most ironically insisted that the Budget was  designed to meet the aspirations of the public and that the government  would not take the easy way out or sacrifice the nation\u2019s long-term  interest for short-term popularity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are not dreamers,\u201d he said in his budget speech today. \u201cWe are  realists. Our success is not mere coincidence but the result of clear  and careful planning as well as firm implementation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For all the admission of the decade of economic stagnation and the  \u2018middle-income trap\u2019 that we are stuck in, I honestly have serious  problem digesting those last words. Is this budget a Najibonomics\u2019?<\/p>\n<p>I rest my case!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad, <\/strong><strong>MP for Kuala Selangor.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was tweeting along as the Finance Minister, DS Najib Tun Razak, unfolded his second budget speech yesterday amidst the usual parliamentary \u2018hecklings\u2019. My tweets and interviews sparingly found its way in the mainstream media and as well the alternative internet-based media-portals. As I really have something to say rather than having to say something [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"better_featured_image":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}