{"id":39102,"date":"2015-10-21T19:23:32","date_gmt":"2015-10-21T11:23:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.buletinonline.net\/v7\/?p=39102"},"modified":"2015-10-21T15:29:01","modified_gmt":"2015-10-21T07:29:01","slug":"6a-upsr-2016-is-a-burden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/6a-upsr-2016-is-a-burden\/","title":{"rendered":"6A UPSR 2016, is a Burden"},"content":{"rendered":"

The decision by the Ministry of Education (MOE) to implement a new format for UPSR in 2016 is seen to be burden many parties. The new format will saw the increase of 6 examination papers. According to the Malaysian Examinations Board (MEB) the new format will be tested to approximately 450,000 students in the next year.<\/p>\n

Sarawak PAS expressed the view that the implementation of this format would burden the students having to face the additional paper that is not appropriate for their age. The teachers, of course, suffer from the increasing workload that had to complete various assessment reports to be filled in order to meet the overall assessment for the new format. Even the English language teachers is certainly given more stress to facing the preparation of English language test that will be divided into 2 papers later. Is it not enough with all experienced by teachers of science and mathematics at PPSMI before? There should not be any repetition on these obstacles.<\/p>\n

This situation can also lead to more students a risk of a victim of experiments to the policy which seemed to only focus on increasing the number of \u2018A\u2019 only. This situation is not in line with the national education policy, which produce a balanced individual in every aspect. This implementation is also seen hastily without long-term planning. Not unlike the implementation of Form 3 Evaluation (PT3) which was announced in 2014 and continue to be implemented in the same year, giving rise to various problems and issues arising. In fact, that most teachers involved has not been disclosed clearly the formats rating and the assessment.<\/p>\n

So, Sarawak PAS urges MOE to conduct the review in more detail in this regard. Certainly we do not want this policy to repeat history of PPSMI which has failed and disadvantageous. The MOE should be more focused towards filling values and skills that match with the current needs of the students. Appropriately the implementation of new policies should have a timeframe and focus group itself. For example, if you want to change the format of year 6, should be amended with effect from the year 1, 2016. Be aware that education is not a factory but is a process of human development.<\/p>\n

\"Haji<\/a>Haji Aman Kiprawi
\nSarawak PAS information chief<\/p>\n

Malay Version<\/strong><\/p>\n

6A UPSR 2016 MEMBEBANKAN<\/p>\n

Keputusan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) yang ingin melaksanakan format baru UPSR pada tahun 2016 dilihat akan membebankan banyak pihak. Format baru tersebut bakal menyaksikan pertambahan 6 kertas peperiksaan. Menurut Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (LPM) format baharu tersebut akan diuji kepada kira-kira 450,000 orang pelajar pada tahun hadapan.<\/p>\n

PAS Sarawak menyatakan pendirian bahawa pelaksanaan format ini akan membebankan pelajar kerana terpaksa menghadapi kertas tambahan yang tidak sesuai dengan umur mereka. Para guru pula sudah tentu mengalami bebanan tugas yang kian bertambah dengan terpaksa menyiapkan pelbagai laporan pentaksiran yang perlu diisi bagi memenuhi penilaian keseluruhan bagi format baharu tersebut. Malahan guru-guru Bahasa Inggeris sudah tentu diberi tekanan yang lebih untuk menghadapi penyediaan ujian Bahasa Inggeris yang akan dipecahkan kepada 2 Kertas nanti. Tidak cukupkah lagi dengan segala yang dialami oleh guru-guru Sains dan Matematik sewaktu PPSMI dahulu? Sepatutnya tidak ada sebarang pengulangan pada halangan seperti ini.<\/p>\n

Keadaan ini juga boleh menyebabkan risiko lebih ramai pelajar menjadi mangsa ujikaji kepada dasar yang nampak hanya berfokus kepada menambah bilangan ‘A’ sahaja. Keadaan ini tidak selaras dengan dasar pendidikan negara yang ingin melahirkan insan yang seimbang dalam pelbagai aspek. Pelaksanaan ini juga dilihat tergesa-gesa tanpa perancangan jangka panjang. Tidak ubah seperti Pelaksanaan Penilaian Tingkatan 3 (PT3) yang diumum pada 2014 dan terus dilaksanakan dalam tahun itu juga sehingga menimbulkan pelbagai masalah dan persoalan berbangkit. Malahan, dimaklumkan bahawa kebanyakan guru-guru yang terlibat masih belum didedahkan dengan jelas format-format penilaian dan pentaksiran tersebut.<\/p>\n

Maka, PAS Sarawak mendesak agar KPM melakukan kajian semula dengan lebih terperinci berkaitan hal ini. Sudah tentu kita tidak mahu dasar ini mengulangi sejarah pelaksanaan PPSMI yang ternyata gagal serta merugikan. Sepatutnya pihak KPM lebih memfokuskan ke arah pengisian nilai dan penguasaan kemahiran pelajar yang sesuai dengan keperluan semasa. Sewajarnya setiap pelaksanaan polisi baharu perlu mempunyai jangka masa dan kumpulan fokus tersendiri. Contohnya, jika ingin mengubah format tahun 6, sepatutnya diubah bermula daripada tahun 1, 2016. Sedarlah bahawa pendidikan bukan kilang tetapi adalah proses pembangunan insan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The decision by the Ministry of Education (MOE) to implement a new format for UPSR in 2016 is seen to be burden many parties. The new format will saw the increase of 6 examination papers. According to the Malaysian Examinations Board (MEB) the new format will be tested to approximately 450,000 students in the next […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":39103,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"better_featured_image":{"id":39103,"alt_text":"","caption":"","description":"","media_type":"image","media_details":{"width":600,"height":392,"file":"2015\/10\/UPSR-2016.jpg","filesize":62306,"sizes":{},"image_meta":{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"1","keywords":[]}},"post":39102,"source_url":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/UPSR-2016.jpg"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39102"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39102\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buletinonlines.net\/v7\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}